Ancestry of Latinos

June 12, 2013

As they say, Hispanic is not a race. Latin Americans are a three-way mix of Europeans (from Spain), Native American Indians, and Sub-Saharan Africans, but proportions of these genetic components vary a lot both between and within different groups.

We find that the most likely source of the indigenous ancestry in Caribbean islanders is a Native South American component shared among coastal tribes from Venezuela, Central America, and the Yucatan peninsula, suggesting extensive gene flow across the Caribbean in pre-Columbian times. We find evidence of two pulses of African migration. The first pulse — which today is reflected by shorter, older ancestry tracts — consists of a genetic component more similar to coastal West African regions involved in early stages of the trans-Atlantic slave trade. The second pulse — reflected by longer, younger tracts — is more similar to present-day West-Central African populations, supporting historical records of later transatlantic deportation. Surprisingly, we also identify a Latino-specific European component that has significantly diverged from its parental Iberian source populations, presumably as a result of small European founder population size.


Figure 1B shows the distribution in PCA space of each individual, recapitulating clustering patterns previously observed in Hispanic/Latino populations: Mexicans cluster largely between European and Native American components, Colombians and Puerto Ricans show three-way admixture, and Dominicans principally cluster between the African and European components. Ours is the first study to characterize genomic patterns of variation from (1) Hondurans, which we show have a higher proportion of African ancestry than Mexicans, (2) Cubans, which show extreme variation in ancestry proportions ranging from 2% to 78% West African ancestry, and (3) Haitians, which showed the largest average proportion of West African ancestry (84%).

Assuming a K=3 admixture model, population admixture patterns are driven by continental reference samples with no continental subdivision (Figure 1C, top panel). However, higher Ks show substantial substructure in all three continental components. [...] At K=8, when the clinal gradient of differentiation between Southern and Northern Europeans appears, the Latino European component is seen only in low proportions in individuals from Portugal and Spain, whereas it is the major European component among Latinos (Figure 1C, bottom panel).

ADMIXTURE clustering analysis using the high-density dataset containing approximately 390K autosomal SNP loci in common across admixed and reference panel populations. Unsupervised models assuming K=3 and K=8 ancestral clusters are shown. At K=3, Caribbean admixed populations show extensive variation in continental ancestry proportions among and within groups. At K=8, sub-continental components show differential proportions in recently admixed individuals. A Latino-specific European component accounts for the majority of the European ancestry among Caribbean Latinos and is exclusively shared with Iberian populations within Europe. Notably, this component is different from the two main gradients of ancestry differentiating southern from northern Europeans. Native Venezuelan components are present in higher proportions in admixed Colombians, Hondurans, and native Mayans.

Moreno-Estrada et al. "Reconstructing the Population Genetic History of the Caribbean". PLOS Genetics, 2013.


Anthony Alfidi said...

Business bias still lives, mostly in the minds of imagined victims. Change your mind, habits, and associations to overcome self-imposed career stereotypes.

Caribou said...

FANTASTIC BLOG! We need more like this that really address and debunk SCIENTIFIC racism, because this is the fuel a lot of racists are running on nowadays.

I would LOVE it if we could affiliate and mention each other's blogs to get more viewership. Would you be open to that? I'd put you in my list of "affiliates" and mention you in my next post.

Racial Reality said...


cosasdehombres said...

Where are the Argentinians, uruguayans and chileans? I dear anybody to prove that those 3 countries have less european roots than USA. In the case of Chile there is a big mix with indians (but no more than 20% of Africans in USA and 20% of "mexicans" -amerindians). In the case of Argentina, almost 94% have european roots according census (and including the illegals from Bolivia and Peru that are all indians). We would have a graphic like Spain.

Unknown said...

Sample size is a problem! I doubt the evidence insofar as when I see the preponderance of my gardners, the maids, the cooks, the "help" etc of the Mexican and Central American "horde' that they are cluster towards to a European index. I would guess that their indigena heritage is a sign of cognitive dissonance at best, for the samples analyzed!