Carthaginian Reconstruction

October 30, 2010

Science and art bring young Carthaginian 'back to life'

By Kaouther Larbi
Agence France Presse
Oct. 28, 2010

CARTHAGE, Tunisia (AFP) — Clad in a white linen tunic, sandals in the ancient Carthaginian style and a pendant and beads like those found with his remains, 2,500-year-old "Ariche" has virtually come back to life on the sacred hill of Byrsa where he was born.

The outcome of scientific cooperation between France and Tunisia, the young man has been remodelled and returned to his native soil in historical Carthage, a city state that lasted from 814 B.C. to 146 B.C. He will be given a place of honour in the museum of modern-day Carthage, north of Tunis.

"The distance that separates the centuries has been erased, the bones are given flesh and the eyes light up anew in a young man who lived right here six centuries before our own era," French ambassador Pierre Menat said at the opening of the exhibition last week.

The modern history of the youth of Byrsa began in 1994 with the fortuitous discovery of a sepulchre on the southern flank of the hill, which is one of the most famous sites of antique Carthage. A joint Franco-Tunisian team moved in to excavate.

"Gone too soon, taken prematurely from life and the love of those close to him (...) he was doubtless of noble birth and his body was buried in this generous African soil," said Leila Sebai, president of the International Council of Museums and commissioner of the exhibition.

An anthropological study of the skeleton showed that the man died between the age of 19 and 24, had a pretty robust physique and was 1.7 metres (five feet six inches) tall, according to a description by Jean Paul Morel, director of the French archaeological team at Carthage Byrsa.

The man from Byrsa has been rebaptised Ariche — meaning the desired man — at the initiative of Culture Minister Abderraouf Basti, who inaugurated the exhibition.

Ariche has regained an almost living human appearance very close in physiognomy to a Carthaginian of the 6th century B.C. after a dermoplastic reconstruction undertaken in Paris by Elisabeth Daynes, a sculptor specialising in hyper-realistic reconstructions.

"He comes back to us thanks to scientific rigour, notably that of paleo-anthropology and forensic medicine, but also the magic of art, that of Elisabeth Daynes, who knows how to bring many faces back from the distant past," Sebai said.

Dermoplastic reconstruction is based on a scientific technique that enables experts to restore the features of an individual with 95 percent accuracy, though some aspects, such as the colour of the eyes and the hair remain partially subjective, she added.

"We can clearly see that this exceptional witness to Carthage in the Punic era is a Mediterranean man, he has all the characteristics," noted Sihem Roudesli, a paleo-anthropologist at the Tunisian National Heritage Institute.

"I hope that like his contemporaries, legendary sailors and bringers of civilisation, this young man can travel across the seas to bear witness on other continents to the greatness of Carthage," Menat said.

Repatriated on September 24, Ariche will be on show at Byrsa until the end of March 2011 when he will travel to Lebanon, the land of the Phoenicians who founded Carthage, for an exhibition at the American University of Beirut.



mimi torchia boothby watercolors said...

He's beautiful. I'm not sure about the hair though.
Do you ever study the less well known (to us) races, like Melanesians and the like?
It occurs to me that there is no place where you can go and look to see "oh that's what people from Bali (insert any country) look like."

Anonymous said...

Your a crypto-fashist! Your a Nazi! The Carthiginians were Africans! Carthige is on the continant of Africa! I saw on the History Chanel that Hanibal looked African! When are these Slave-driving, Imperial, Nativist honkie crackers going to stop tring to steel African heros as there own? Carthige is on the continant of Africa, so this man must of looked African!!!!

truth said...

No, carthaginians were of semitic origin, not African.

floridian said...

Anonymous, wrong. African does not equal "negroid". Ever see the Amazigh people of North Africa? Berbers too - not "black". Living in north Africa for thousands of years,
"whiter" than many Europeans. Egyptians, too - their own "race", distinct from sub-Saharans. Carthaginians were from ancient Phoenecia, seafaring people from coasts of what is now Lebanon. They were Mediterranean.

amber said...

wow!!! :D

Ruling Class Mentality said...

African does equal Black African...Negroid is a is not what the African race is. Berbers were Black but became White due to miscegination with Greeks, Romans and Phonecians......Northern Africa was once all Black Africa....

Egypt today is called the Arabic Republic of Egypt not African and in fact every Northern African Country is called Arab Republic its called colonialization.

Ruling Class Mentality said...

I will say this I don't believe Hannibal or any of those invaders are African, neither was Mumar Gadafffi who was an Arab Nationalist who for some reason Authentic Black African peoples try to claim Gadaffi was a Black Africa even though he was an Arab Colonizer no different than the European British, Dutch Boers in Azania what the West calls South Africa

Racial Reality said...

>>> "Berbers were Black but became White due to miscegination with Greeks, Romans and Phonecians......Northern Africa was once all Black Africa...."

No, that's backwards. North Africans were originally Caucasoids from the Middle East, and then they received some black admixture later:

>>> "Egypt today is called the Arabic Republic of Egypt not African"

Egyptians were Caucasoid way before Arab colonization: