Global Admixture Analysis at K=6

December 31, 2013

This new study has one of the biggest global admixture analyses ever done (185 populations at 293,832 SNPs), but it's a little hard to view so I made a more user friendly version of one of the runs. I chose K=6 because it shows clearly the divisions and admixture between the six main racial groups: Capoid (red), Negroid (orange), Caucasoid (blue), Americoid (green), Mongoloid (yellow) and Australoid (purple). Click the image below to enlarge it and scroll down for examples of the racial types.

K=2 separates African from non-African populations.

K=3 reveals a West Eurasian ancestry component [Blue].

K=4 breaks the African component into an African hunter-gatherer ancestry maximized in Bushmen such as the Ju_hoan_North [Red] and an African farmer component maximized in the Yoruba [Orange].

K=5 breaks the ENA [eastern non-African] component down into one maximized in the Karitiana from the Americas [Green] and one maximized in the Ami from Taiwan [Yellow].

K=6 reveals a south Eurasian component maximized in Papuans [Purple], which is also represented in South Asians.

Ju'hoan (Namibia)
Yoruba (Nigeria)
Sardinian (Italy)

Karitiana (Brazil)
Ami (Taiwan)
Papuan (PNG)


Truthteller said...

How is the purple component Australoid if the Onge aren't shown to be full purple?

Racial Reality said...

Obviously because it's almost 100% in Australian Aborigines and Papuans.

Truthteller said...

So then, are the Onge around 40% mongoloid? Because I have not read that anywhere. Yet that's what K=6 shows.

Periferia Sud said...

Nice one. I am a bit negative about that Iranians are so pure caucasoids tho'

Mark Royer said...

Are the Ainu missing from the study, or did I just skip over them?

roberto quintas said...

the study shows the different ethnics, not different races.

Varg said...

Sorry,but Papuan Austroloids probably are old Turkic Kypchaks.

Max said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
depescaun said...

roberto quintas, there are as many ethnicities as there are countries. This study obviously shows racial i.e. genetic differences. Seems to me like you've got it precisely backwards - you'd probably say that the French and the Germans are two distinct races, but same white ethnicity. They are two distinct ethnicities, but same white race.

Gregory76 said...

I long thought that we need to distinguish a Negritoid or Andamanoid primary race from the Australoid primary race, with Papuans (and Melanesians) being mainly Negritoid. They are distinguish phenotypically from Australoids by hair texture at least, being more like Negroids on this point.
Modern genetic work seems to me to confirm this, with modifications. It shows the two heavily mixed, with a large Australoid component in New Guinea and a large Papuan component in Australia. And it seems to show a third element.
This reminds me of Birdsell's trihybrid theory. He thought that there were 3 elements involved in Australasia: Tasmanoids (Negroid pygmies), Carpentarians (tall, dark and non-white Veddoids) and Murrayians (archaic Caucasoids Ainoids).
Y haplotypes and MtDna haplotypes seem to confirm this, mainly.
As to MtDna haployptes, Q is strong in New Guinea, N is strong in Australia and P is a strong minority in both. This suggests that Q is Negritoid, N is Australoid and P is Caucasoid.
As to Y haplotypes, M is strong in New Guinea, C is strong in Australia and K is a strong minority in both. This suggest that C is Australoid and K is Caucasoid, and would suggest that M is Negritoid, but M is descended from K, and so I think that the Caucasoids killed off the male husbands of Q and married the widows.
Also, when I say "Caucasoids" I mean people of Eurasian origin related to ancestors of Caucasoids, even thought there phenotype was probably had been shaped into something like that of the Negroids and Australoids.
And I would say that the Negritoids in the area need not have been of pygmy height. That seems to be an an adoption to dense forest.