We find that the most likely source of the indigenous ancestry in Caribbean islanders is a Native South American component shared among coastal tribes from Venezuela, Central America, and the Yucatan peninsula, suggesting extensive gene flow across the Caribbean in pre-Columbian times. We find evidence of two pulses of African migration. The first pulse — which today is reflected by shorter, older ancestry tracts — consists of a genetic component more similar to coastal West African regions involved in early stages of the trans-Atlantic slave trade. The second pulse — reflected by longer, younger tracts — is more similar to present-day West-Central African populations, supporting historical records of later transatlantic deportation. Surprisingly, we also identify a Latino-specific European component that has significantly diverged from its parental Iberian source populations, presumably as a result of small European founder population size.
[...]
Figure 1B shows the distribution in PCA space of each individual, recapitulating clustering patterns previously observed in Hispanic/Latino populations: Mexicans cluster largely between European and Native American components, Colombians and Puerto Ricans show three-way admixture, and Dominicans principally cluster between the African and European components. Ours is the first study to characterize genomic patterns of variation from (1) Hondurans, which we show have a higher proportion of African ancestry than Mexicans, (2) Cubans, which show extreme variation in ancestry proportions ranging from 2% to 78% West African ancestry, and (3) Haitians, which showed the largest average proportion of West African ancestry (84%).
Assuming a K=3 admixture model, population admixture patterns are driven by continental reference samples with no continental subdivision (Figure 1C, top panel). However, higher Ks show substantial substructure in all three continental components. [...] At K=8, when the clinal gradient of differentiation between Southern and Northern Europeans appears, the Latino European component is seen only in low proportions in individuals from Portugal and Spain, whereas it is the major European component among Latinos (Figure 1C, bottom panel).
Moreno-Estrada et al. "Reconstructing the Population Genetic History of the Caribbean". PLOS Genetics, 2013.
4 comments
Business bias still lives, mostly in the minds of imagined victims. Change your mind, habits, and associations to overcome self-imposed career stereotypes. http://alfidicapitalblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/stereotypes-and-pathologies-in-business.html
FANTASTIC BLOG! We need more like this that really address and debunk SCIENTIFIC racism, because this is the fuel a lot of racists are running on nowadays.
I would LOVE it if we could affiliate and mention each other's blogs to get more viewership. Would you be open to that? I'd put you in my list of "affiliates" and mention you in my next post.
genocidalracetraitor.blogspot.com
^OK
Where are the Argentinians, uruguayans and chileans? I dear anybody to prove that those 3 countries have less european roots than USA. In the case of Chile there is a big mix with indians (but no more than 20% of Africans in USA and 20% of "mexicans" -amerindians). In the case of Argentina, almost 94% have european roots according census (and including the illegals from Bolivia and Peru that are all indians). We would have a graphic like Spain.
Post a Comment
Be civil. Write clearly. Proofread and preview. Don't troll or spam. Stay on topic.