tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7700059.post2194499879470174883..comments2024-03-08T08:26:10.748+00:00Comments on Racial Reality: Who's Really "More European"?Racial Realityhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02507362910443691074noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7700059.post-49003744915556327272023-06-13T02:43:04.074+01:002023-06-13T02:43:04.074+01:00@Jason Muniz
I think that what will happen is eit...@Jason Muniz<br /><br />I think that what will happen is either east asians will rise (thanks to northern european misjudgment of elevating them economically) or a resurgence of northern european power, the low impulse control mediocre intelligence groups of the mediterranean and middle east do not have what it takes to compete in a globalized world and are further spiralling into irrelevance. I MyeDinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13839107529127124516noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7700059.post-81313066914873397652020-11-10T16:07:14.419+00:002020-11-10T16:07:14.419+00:00This isn't quite right and of course, Reich ha...This isn't quite right and of course, Reich has an agenda.<br /><br />East African urheimat<br />South Eurasian urheimat(pre flood persian gulf)<br />Eurasian divergence by Expansion from south eruasian urheimat into eurasian hunter gatherers.<br />South Eurasian continuity<br />Ice Age<br />Anatolian-Caucasian Eurasian divergence <br />Ancestral North Eurasian divergence<br />Post Ice Age Curthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07783643071088103705noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7700059.post-60623403851141154282020-04-09T03:41:14.771+01:002020-04-09T03:41:14.771+01:00Basal Eurasian definitely played a significant rol...Basal Eurasian definitely played a significant role in so called "Caucasoid" morphology, in my opinion. Think about it, It's present all over Eurasia and Africa, North of the Sahara and West of the Himalayas. It was actually a fusion of this with the Crown Eurasians who settled West Eurasia that we call modern Caucasians or Caucasoids. <br /><br />But then again, RR. Why are Arch Hadeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00679577049261430513noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7700059.post-70169181479945551002020-02-28T17:02:35.627+00:002020-02-28T17:02:35.627+00:00And while they still have some of their beloved Eu...<i>And while they still have some of their beloved European hunter-gatherer ancestry, it turns out that's <b>Asian-related</b>.</i><br /><br />I was under the impression that ANE was on genetically the west side of the West Eurasian/East Eurasian split that occurred 45,000 years ago. <br />Did you mean geographically Asian? If so Mal'ta–Buret was indeed in Irkutsk, but the Sungir EHG PEShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18280722978507689031noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7700059.post-55386993002231293942020-02-14T23:46:40.654+00:002020-02-14T23:46:40.654+00:00In my opinion, the civilizations that have continu...In my opinion, the civilizations that have continued to our era can be summed up as follows:<br /><br />1- Greek <br />2- Assyrian (think of the Neo-Assyrian Empire centered in Mesopotamia and the Levant with Aramaic as the favored language, which would later contribute a lot to Hebrew and Arabic)<br />3- Indian<br />4- Chinese <br /><br />All these civilizations crystallized during the <a href="Onur Dincerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05041378853428912894noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7700059.post-77325488775364864892020-02-13T19:30:56.168+00:002020-02-13T19:30:56.168+00:00Greeks are up there but they seem to have a tragic...Greeks are up there but they seem to have a tragic and/or anarchic mentality which eventually ruins their ambitions for global dominance. This is unlike the victorious, pragmatic and universalist mentality of the Romans. In my opinion there are only 4 or 5 civilizations/societies in our epoch: Latin Mediterranean(the west as it is stupidly called), Near Eastern Islamic, Hindu, Chinese, and SlavicDisciplinalucishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14806381740054818957noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7700059.post-62260216672336688952020-01-26T23:51:36.542+00:002020-01-26T23:51:36.542+00:00Even before reading this very well written article...Even before reading this very well written article, I believed that Southern Europeans are the older population and the builders of the first civilizations in Europe. Here is just one simple argument: if you visit Malta, you will see megalithic temples (made of massive, even over 50-ton blocks!) as old as 3600 B.C., that is, from a time when the main ancestors of the Northern Europeans were not Lucianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06034217327889879729noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7700059.post-90777517453373933432019-12-28T20:08:07.098+00:002019-12-28T20:08:07.098+00:00I consider Southern Europeans especially Latins(br...I consider Southern Europeans especially Latins(broad sense) and Middle Easterners, Iranics/Aryans in particular,true master/imperial races. The era when the Romans and Persians contested for world supremacy must have been quite a time. But in both cases, the populations are not purely neolithic or ANE, autosomally speaking, however they are dominated by R1 haplogroups. I have a feeling that thatJason Munizhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16653968903448614339noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7700059.post-47940421259804966252019-12-23T04:11:31.990+00:002019-12-23T04:11:31.990+00:00Racial Reality:
Nice post. I appreciate the way y...Racial Reality:<br /><br />Nice post. I appreciate the way you challenge both the Nordicists and Afro-centrist with the studies you review and post on.<br /><br />Cheers,Palermo Trapanihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00901462766804949624noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7700059.post-40530976293027939222019-12-05T18:41:15.700+00:002019-12-05T18:41:15.700+00:00True. Especially for CHG. For EHG I should say tha...True. Especially for CHG. For EHG I should say that their ANE ancestry came to Europe some thousands of years earlier than 5000 ya. This discussion of who is more European is illogical or done on an illogical basis (I am saying this for especially Nordicists as they are the ones who start it in the first place). The discussion of who is more West Eurasian (Caucasoid) is much more meaningful from Onur Dincerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05041378853428912894noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7700059.post-83337633698516287052019-12-05T14:30:19.758+00:002019-12-05T14:30:19.758+00:00That's part of it, but it's also the timin...That's part of it, but it's also the timing of migrations. Nordicists used to say that Mideast ancestry from ~40,000ya was "European", but from ~10,000ya was not. So Mideast <b><i>and</i></b> Siberian ancestry from ~5000ya must be even <b><i>less</i></b> European.Racial Realityhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02507362910443691074noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7700059.post-14957614484190229852019-12-04T19:25:10.468+00:002019-12-04T19:25:10.468+00:00I know you ask your question "who is more Eur...I know you ask your question "who is more European" sarcastically to mock the Europeanness fetish of Nordicists and turn it upside down. So on a more serious note the question that is actually being tackled is "who is more Caucasoid" or "who is more West Eurasian" (because, as you point out, it seems that European hunter-gatherers were less Caucasoid than modern Onur Dincerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05041378853428912894noreply@blogger.com